Money Laundering Case: Nora Fatehi recorded her statement in the 200 crore fraud case, will Sukesh Chandrashekhar's secret be revealed?

 Bollywood actress Nora Fatehi has recorded her statement in the Patiala House Court in Delhi in a case related to cheating of 200 crores. The case involves conman Sukesh Chandrasekhar, who is accused of giving expensive gifts and luxury items to Bollywood actresses. Nora's statement was recorded against Sukesh under sections 50(2) and 50(3) of the Laundering Act 2002.

Nora herself reached the Economic Offenses Wing of Delhi Police and requested to record her statement in this matter. After this, the Delhi Police got Nora's statement recorded in the Patiala House Court. Nora has been interrogated by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) several times in the money laundering case. During interrogation, Nora revealed that Sukesh had gifted a BMW car worth about Rs 65 lakh to Nora's brother-in-law Bobby.

Sukesh Chandrasekhar's name has been in the news for some time now, and his involvement with several Bollywood actresses has come to light. Jacqueline Fernandes's name is also related to this case. She had filed a petition to go abroad, but the Patiala House Court refused to grant her permission during the hearing. 

#WATCH | Delhi: Actor-dancer Nora Fatehi leaves from Patiala House Court in Delhi. She appeared before the Court and gave a statement before magistrate to assist the investigation of Rs 200 Crore money laundering case linked to conman Sukesh Chandrasekhar. pic.twitter.com/KVL9A7txEr

— ANI (@ANI) January 13, 2023

The case has caused a stir in the Bollywood industry, with many questioning the relationship between Sukesh Chandrasekhar and the actresses. Such incidents raise questions about the vulnerability of actresses in the industry and the need for better safeguards and regulations.

It is essential to note that the case is still under investigation, and no one has been found guilty of any charges. It is imperative to wait for the legal process to take its course before jumping to any conclusions. However, the case has shed light on the need for more stringent measures to protect artists and performers from exploitation and fraud in the entertainment industry.